Wednesday, 30 June 2010

England's early exit - An opportunity for parody

The World Cup has been an inspiration for creative and innovative advertising – often involving massive budgets, country wide participation and glut of English heroes, celebrities and of course footballers.

With England’s exit, and the disgruntled sentiment of the nation, many of these ads will lose their punch or, as was the case of Nike’s behemothic “Write The Future,” retrospectively end up looking almost like a parody.

However where some brands are left wondering if they’ve scored an own goal, others see opportunity...


This final one isn't an actual advert, but creative team Adam + Dan's parody of the Kit Kat - "cross your fingers" campaign. I think it nicely echoes the current public sentiment.


Thursday, 17 June 2010

Retro geekery & analog-digital hybrids

It seems that the release of tech such as the iPad has not only encouraged software innovation (developers add 1,000 new apps per week), but also some pretty unconventional functionalities. The current trend of analog-digital synthesis is producing some marvellously innovative stuff, as well as pushing the boundaries of retro-geekery. Here are few cool bits & pieces that have surfaced up this week.

A “groundbreaking innovation in the field of obsolescence” - The USB Typewriter Dock holds an iPad in its carriage whilst simultaneously inputting typed letters. ( Read more about it here)




An iPad stand made out of an original Macintosh Classic (here)




This Moleskine Kindle Cover is an analog-digital hybrid that makes me go slightly weak at the knees. (here)



Thursday, 20 May 2010

No one does football quite like Nike.

Actually. No one does football adverts quite like Nike.

Spine tingling..
goose pimpling...
pulse racing...
mind blowing...
day making adverts.

In 2008 72andSunny & Guy Richie took us to the "Next Level"



In 2010 - World Cup year - Wieden+Kennedy have bettered that.
And then some.


Sublime.

Thursday, 25 March 2010

Dust yourself off and try again.

For a while now I’ve had my heart set on becoming an Adman.

Grad schemes seemed the way of getting in.

So between October and January I sent off about 6-7 applications.

I got four first round interviews.

I proceeded to three final assessment days.

At the end of those assessment days was a mock pitch.

Twice my group won the pitch and were rewarded with champagne.

Twice I was told that I came within touching distance of the job.

Feedback: “nothing to improve”.

Finally, my persistence paid off.

I was offered a job at CHI & Partners.

I am chuffed to bits.

It’s not been easy.

But as Machiavelli said “The end justifies the means”


The last six months have been some of the most challenging of my life.

Sometimes applying felt like a full time job.

Not ideal, when I was also working 40 hours a week at Ted Baker.

Which, while I enjoyed working there, wasn’t exactly stimulating.

Or inspiring.

Or particularly useful.

I mean Ted Baker don’t even advertise.

So it was hard to stay motivated.

Hard to concentrate on applying in my spare time.

However, I feel that it was more rewarding this way.

There are a few things that I picked up from my experiences.

Some negative, mostly positive.


Word to the wise: Don’t check your email 5 minutes before an interview.

I was foolish enough to do this before my JWT first round.

The email said M&C weren’t calling me back.

Needles to say I entered the interview in the worst of mindsets.

It was hard to resist letting desperation replace eagerness.

I came out of it with the lowest of expectations.

But I needn’t have worried.

JWT gave me a call back.

And I learnt a lesson about the unpredictability of subjectivity.

Don’t write something off before the interviewer’s ink has dried.


Most people wouldn’t ask for feedback from a successful interview.

When sometimes learning what you did right is as important as criticism.

I didn’t ask.

So I’m not sure what I did right that got me through that JWT interview.

However, I approached each interview with two main goals in mind.

And I think I must have nailed one of them to have got through.

The first one is pretty obvious.

Prove you have what it takes to do the role you’ve applied for.

In the case of a graduate role, show you have potential.

Prove to them that you have a fascination with advertising.

With trends.

With strategy.

With culture.

With consumers.

Know what you’re talking about.

If you don’t know what they’re talking about, admit it.

They can’t fault you for being curious.

Prove that you’re right for their industry.

The second goal is passing what I call “the train delay test.”

Prove that were you stuck on a train for three hours, they wouldn’t get bored of you.

It just reminded me to be myself and relax.

In most cases they’d relax too.

Turning the interview into a conversation.

I put these two processes to work in most of my interviews.

Apart from my first, at M&C Saatchi.

I didn’t get a call back from them, but did from all the others.


Assessment days were the most rewarding aspects of the process.

The three I attended were at JWT, CHI & Partners and Elvis.

All made me more eager to work for the respective agencies.

All were demanding, but reassuringly formulaic.

I’d recommend applying to these agencies.

JWT assessment was the most demanding by far.

Two days of talks, group work and interviews.

Culminating in a mock brief and 18 hours to come up with a pitch.

- complete with insight, strategy and creative.

Someone likened the experience to ‘The Apprentice’.

It could easily have been as daunting as that.

But the people at JWT set me at ease.

From the drinks in the bar to the lovely dinner.

(Which “wasn’t part of the interview,” but which definitely was)

From the hotel accommodation to the snacks.

As we were selling ourselves to them.

They were selling JWT to us.

I’ll admit I was sold.

Elvis also set me at ease from the start.

It was the first time they had held an assessment day.

You wouldn’t have guessed.

It was a really enjoyable day.

Followed by a chatty dinner and some screeching karaoke.

As had happened at JWT, my group won the mock pitch task again.

In both cases I got a bottle of champagne for my efforts.

In both cases I didn’t get the job.


After JWT I had named it the ‘champagne curse.’

I was prepared by the time I heard from Elvis.

It was a witty excuse to have.

But it taught me something.

Just as you shouldn’t write off a bad interview.

You shouldn’t get your hopes up either.

Chris D’Sylva, a guy who took it upon himself to mentor me.

(along with many others to whom I’m indebted)*

Taught me that along with creativity, curiosity and confidence.

The best thing for someone to have is humility.

I now know why this is such positive attribute.


If I had been headstrong these rejections might have crushed me.

I’ll admit I was disappointed.

Getting so close and missing at the final hurdle.

It was harder, when I was told there was not much I could improve.

“No criticism we can give you.”

All that effort and do you have anything to show for it?

Because the sad truth is that you don’t.

Apart from the bitter taste of champagne.

But I realised that while I hadn’t got the job, someone else had.

Probably equally as good as myself, or better.

I’d met them myself.

I knew how good they were – I’d studied them - they were my competition.

And they’d beaten me this time.

It meant that this time subjectivity had not dealt in my favour.

Humility is admitting that, especially at my age, you can’t win them all.

But getting so far meant something.

I knew I belonged in the industry.

This belief galvanised me.

I knew that, just as I’d lost out.

The roles could easily have been reversed.

If I kept at it then it would eventually go my way.


I made no secret of this when I went for my final CHI & Partners interview.

It was not a desperate plea for sympathy.

I made sure it wasn’t received that way.

While I couldn’t put “I got to two assessment days” on my CV.

I could now tell them with greater conviction that I knew I belonged in the industry.

That I knew I belonged at CHI.

And I got the job.


It’s a first step in the advertising industry.

And I’ve still to prove I’m any good.

But when I start in mid April, I’ll be grateful to be there.

More grateful than I would have been had I walked into a job on my first attempt.

Because I know how hard I worked for it.

I know the bitterness of rejection.

And I won’t take it for granted.


I hope others can take heart from this.

Everyone out there that didn’t make it first, second, third time.

That fell at the final hurdle.

Because if you got that far, you know you belong.

And if you hold on to that knowledge, it will happen.



*Can’t thank these lovely people enough.


My ad 'fairy godmother', Liz Nottingham.

My ad 'aunt', Karen Cooper.

My inspirational and frustratingly brilliant planner cousin, Dylan Viner.

My mad genius Oz mentor, Chris D’Sylva.

Neil Francis, Sara Stoneham and all the other people that have given me advice & motivation over cups of coffee.

Christian et al., at CHI & Partners for giving me a job!

JWT, Elvis and M&C for letting me get as far as I did.


Oh and also Dave Trott – indirectly.

His inspirational blogging and book Creative Mischief’ kept me motivated during lunch breaks while I was working at Ted and inspired the layout of this blog post.

Thursday, 28 January 2010

BOGOF!

Photo by Weglet (CC by 2.0)

BOGOF! It may sound like a rudely dismissive phrase, but in fact it’s the most potent acronym in a supermarket’s arsenal. Buy One, Get One Free – five words that induce economic orgasm in shoppers, euphoria overpowering any semblance of rational transaction.

My mother, bless her, is particularly susceptible to such deals. We might end up with six months supply of mayonnaise or enough soya sauce to bathe in. After a particularly enthusiastic shopping trip one might be forgiven for thinking our family was stockpiling to survive a nuclear winter.

Whilst at university I had a similar problem. I wasn’t attracted to bogof deals because of the price, but because it gave me two uniform shapes to fit in my trolley. In modern times, where excessive packaging means one can no longer blindly identify an item of food just from its shape, I have developed a form of shopping trolley OCD. I stack like Tetris. While I’ve written off the conspiracy theory that supermarkets are promoting bogof deals to exploit my irrational and so far unique quirk, they are a contentious subject in today’s self reflective consumer society.

When your fridge is already full you have two options, you eat it or you chuck it. Obesity is thrown around (probably with some difficulty), but one cannot deny that it, and many chronic diseases, are self inflicted ailments that continue to thrive due to over eating.

A characteristic of post-apocalyptic films are admonishing statements about ‘the world before,’ The Book of Eli was no exception. One of Denziel’s best was “We had more than we needed. We threw away things people would kill for now.” In the context of the film it was worthy of an eye roll, but in the cold harsh light of the supermarket aisle it’s alarmingly relevant. In the UK alone perfectly good food to the value of £10 billion is dumped each year. £6 billion of which has never been used/opened and £1 billion is within date.

However you can quote as many stats, show as many sickening photos and run as many adverts and as you like, but it won’t change the fact that we’re suckers for a ‘bargain’.

So it’s nice to see Tesco are launching Buy One, Get One Free Later; allowing shoppers to postpone their free second product until a later visit. Now mother can get her bargain relatively guilt free and I might become rehabilitated from shopping trolley OCD. It’s a first step towards avoiding want in the unpredictable future.

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

A very social sale


Slightly off the pace with this, but when I passed Social Suicide in Carnaby St. yesterday the sight of their innovative, interactive Dictator Discount sale spurred me into blogging action.

It’s a fantastic idea. For their winter sale Social Suicide have decided to leave their discount up to General Joe Public; letting mentions in social media and news coverage dictate the percentage in real time.

“The more you say, the less you pay. All you have to do is a little Twittering or better still blogging… or better still BBC News at 10ing, and we will bow to your command.”

They’ve come up with a weighting system to apply to each medium and have search feeds looking for mentions of “Social Suicide”, “socialsuicide.co.uk”, Dictators of Fashion”, “General J. Public”, “Dictator Discount,” etc.

It’s not the first time they have left sale percentages out of their hands. In the summer they set up a direct link with the Met Office in store to display the temperature outside and set discounts accordingly. However it wasn’t the greatest of risks, knowing the British Summer.

While I can only speculate about the success of the enterprise, I think the Dictator Discount is a brilliant example of a marriage between social media, marketing and a brand. It also occurred to me that while I had no intention of buying their clothes I was more than happy to spread the word and boost the percentage. It’s a form of altruism; something one would not normally associate with the self interest and greed induced by ‘the sales’. At the time I passed the discount had dropped to 18%, but hopefully this post, and others like it today, might present a fortunate visitor with a great deal.

Saturday, 26 December 2009

Smells like Christmas

You can't have watched TV this Christmas without noticing the bombardment of adverts for branded products suitable as gifts, and no product has been advertised more frequently than the humble fragrance. You’ll have been subjected by at least two or three each ad break. I’ve never really got the point of fragrances, most of them smell the same to me, but what really interests me is the way that they are marketed.

This is because until some nutty professor one comes up with a practical, affordable, home version of smell-o-vision we shan’t be able to smell what they’re selling. This can be troublesome because when it comes down to it fragrances only have two tangible parts, real value if you will, and that’s the scent and the bottle. Therefore they rely on marketing their perceived value through emotive means that dazzle the audience’s other senses and differentiate themselves from competitors. It seems that fragrance brands have pulled every trick out of the bag this Christmas. They’ve brought to our screens a glut of famous faces, iconic soundtracks, passionate voiceovers, stunning settings and not forgetting a selection of inventive product names.

Perceived value #1 - The Name.

Challenge. XS. Cool Water. CKin2U. Be Delicious. CK Free. Be Delicious Red. 1 Million. Adventure. Fuel For Life. Sex Panther. Only The Brave. I Am King. They may read like a list of requirements you need to meet to join Gok Wan’s private army, but these are all fragrances for men. Some may have recognised ‘Sex Panther’ in there, it’s a fictional fragrance from comedy film Anchorman, but it honestly doesn’t look out of place amongst the real names. And as for those pour femme? Well, looking at a list of women’s fragrances is like having a life coach repeatedly smash you in the face with an emotional thesaurus. No doubt hours of brainstorming and thousands of pounds worth of focus groups contribute in the end to the dynamic, powerful, sexual nouns that might add perceived value to the product. On the other hand, maybe not. ‘Gucci’ by Gucci – now that must have been a Eureka moment.

The Advert.
This can be broken down into four main base parts. The setting, the celebrity, the soundtrack and the voiceover.

Perceived value #2 - The Setting.

In a bedroom. On a boat. On a beach. In the sea. In front of a mirror. In a hotel room. 21st Century Paris. In a lift. In a staircase. In bed. On a roof. Monte Carlo. In a car. On a car. London. In an abandoned loft space. In the rain. 19th century Paris. In a casino. On another planet. New York. On a motorbike. On stage. In a ballroom. Outside a hotel. Surrounded by paparazzi. Amongst nature.
All these locations have been in one advert or another; the setting for the fantastic, almost comical montages that are guaranteed to occur.

Perceived value #3 -The Celebrity.

Most fragrances are aspirational products. Associating their product with someone the audience would like to emulate gives it further value. Generally it’s a nameless model, but sometimes, particularly at Christmas we find actors sacrificing their artistic integrity by associating themselves with a particular scent. This year has seen Hayden Christensen, Sienna Miller, Matthew McConaughey, Evangeline Lily, Ewan McGregor, James Franco, Beyonce, Jude Law, Kate Moss, Audrey Tatou, Josh Holloway and several others, lending their face, voice and character to a smell. And who can blame them? It must be terribly easy work. In fact I’m sure that in the Gucci Advert they just followed James Franco as he went through his daily routine of sitting, staring and walking around his dimly lit apartment.

However they don’t always work. Ewan McGregor got a huge amount of stick for his Davidoff ‘Adventure’ advert. You could see what they were trying to do, but does anyone believe when he was motor biking around the world he gave a damn what he smelt like? The advert did lead to this great parody though. Sometimes it has the wrong effect. For instance, whenever I see Josh Holloway and Evangeline Lily appear in their respective Davidoff ‘Cool Water’ adverts I don’t feel remotely compelled to buy the fragrance, but instead develop the overwhelming urge to watch my entire Lost box set.

Perceived value #4 - The Voiceover.

“Moisture is the essence of wetness, and wetness is the essence of beauty.” – Derek Zoolander

A ridiculous line from a brilliantly funny movie, but also an accurate representation of some of the bizarre copy that genuine fragrance adverts use to evoke emotions and add further value to their product. This Christmas has offered a plethora of grandiloquent, vapid voiceovers. Here’s a selection. See if you can match the line to the product?

a) “Life’s a game – Go for it”
b) “Who’s going to tell me when to stop? Which way to go? Who’s right? Who’s wrong? Who’s going to judge me? Me.”
c) “You’re running with me”
d) “The scent of adventure in the air.”
e) “Wear it – with passion”
f) “Use with caution”
g) “The best thing about getting lost is, what you find along the way”

1) Davidoff ‘Adventure’ 2) Diesel ‘Fuel For Life 3) Boss ‘Orange’ 4) ‘Gucci’ by Gucci 5) CK ‘Free’ 6) Diesel ‘Only The Brave’ 7) Lacoste ‘Challenge’

Perceived value #5 - The Soundtrack.

I’ve blogged before about the relationship between music and adverts, and fragrances are no exception. Perhaps the best sense to evoke when smell is not an option is sound, it can be sensuous and emotional which is similar to what the fragrance is designed to achieve. However, even that cannot begin to explain some of the song choices this year. Okay “Diamonds are a girls best friend” was the obvious choice for the Emporio Armani ‘Diamonds’ advert, but some other choices have me bemused. “ShadowPlay” by The Killers, “Drive My Car” by The Hot Rats, "Do It Again" by Chemical Brothers, “Slave To Love” by Róisín Murphy (Bryan Ferry Cover) and “I Feel You” by Depeche Mode were all slightly bizarre selections.

So there you have it. While they may be bafflingly irrelevant, pretentious, vacuous and annoyingly pop up on your telly every hour or so, I actually thoroughly enjoyed having a Christmas where advertising was dominated by fragrances, and hopefully after reading this you will to.